MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 vs Unlimited-OCR-2

Official MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 efficiency and quality figure from the OpenBMB GitHub assets
OpenBMB/MiniCPM-OCR assets/minicpm-ocr/efficiency-performance-en.png. Source · License: Apache-2.0.
Official Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2 card figure
baidu/Unlimited-OCR-2 assets/Unlimited-OCR2.png. Source · License: Baidu card image.
Verdict. Pick MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 if you want OpenBMB’s ungated Apache-2.0 ~1.3B OCR-specific MiniCPM-V/o card (zh/en; GitHub LICENSE file; SDK + layout model named). Pick Unlimited-OCR-2 if you want Baidu’s official ungated ~3.3B long-document card that names SR-SWA and a 131,072 config context (MIT tag; no LICENSE blob on 2026-10-28). Both are official org cards. Vendor benches stay vendor. We have no sourced bake-off.

Compare MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 and Unlimited-OCR-2.

DimensionMiniCPM-OCR 1.0Unlimited-OCR-2Source
Developer / hostOpenBMB (huggingface.co/openbmb/MiniCPM-OCR-1.0)Baidu (huggingface.co/baidu/Unlimited-OCR-2)Hugging Face API
Licenseapache-2.0 card tag; GitHub LICENSE Apache-2.0; HF LICENSE 404mit card tag; LICENSE sibling 404 (2026-10-28)HF cardData / GitHub LICENSE (2026-10-29 / 2026-10-28)
GatingNoNoHugging Face API
Parameters (safetensors)1,300,434,160 (~1.30B)3,343,978,497 (~3.34B)Hugging Face API
Architectureminicpm_ocr / MiniCPMOcrForConditionalGenerationunlimited-ocr / UnlimitedOCRForCausalLMconfig.json
Context (config.json)262,144 (text_config.max_position_embeddings)131,072config.json
Languages (card)Chinese and Englishmultilingual (card)Official READMEs
Hugging Face likes / downloads261 / 791 (2026-10-29)228 / 513 (2026-10-28)Hugging Face API
GitHubOpenBMB/MiniCPM-OCR · 237★ / 16 forks · Apache-2.0No first-party repo opened on the Unlimited-OCR-2 pageGitHub API (2026-10-29)
Quality vs Acrobat OCRNot independently testedNot independently testedn/a

When to choose which

Read the entity pages: MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 and Unlimited-OCR-2. Both hang off Adobe Acrobat alternatives. MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 is not MiniCPM-V 4.7. Unlimited-OCR-2 is Baidu’s official card, not a random fine-tune. DeepSeek’s OCR card is a third entity: DeepSeek-OCR — Unlimited-OCR-2 vs DeepSeek-OCR.

Why this comparison exists

MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 (card created 2026-10-21) is OpenBMB’s OCR-specific ~1.3B card. Unlimited-OCR-2 is already on this site as Baidu’s ~3.3B long-document card. Same job class (document OCR weights). Different size, license file, and family. This is identification, not a bake-off.

Sourced snapshot (2026-10-29)

Field MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 Unlimited-OCR-2
Host huggingface.co/openbmb/MiniCPM-OCR-1.0 (not gated) huggingface.co/baidu/Unlimited-OCR-2 (not gated)
HF likes / downloads 261 / 791 228 / 513 (2026-10-28)
License apache-2.0 tag + GitHub LICENSE; HF blob missing mit tag; no LICENSE file (2026-10-28)
Size (tensors) 1,300,434,160 3,343,978,497
config.json context 262,144 (text_config) 131,072
Job image-text-to-text (document OCR) image-text-to-text (document OCR)
Quality vs Acrobat Not independently tested Not independently tested

License

MiniCPM-OCR 1.0: Hub license:apache-2.0; GitHub Apache License 2.0; Hugging Face LICENSE blob missing on 2026-10-29. Unlimited-OCR-2: Hub license:mit; LICENSE blob missing on 2026-10-28. Not legal advice.

How to choose

See also Writing & Office. Catalog: home. Editorial: About.

FAQ

Which is more accurate on long PDFs?

We do not rank them. MiniCPM-OCR’s OmniDocBench / Real5 / pages/s lines stay vendor. Unlimited-OCR-2’s MPDocBench / MarathonDocBench lines stay vendor. Do not merge those tables.

Is MiniCPM-OCR a fine-tune of Unlimited-OCR-2 or DeepSeek-OCR?

The MiniCPM card says it is trained for OCR on MiniCPM-V 4.6. Treat it as OpenBMB’s official OCR card. Unlimited-OCR-2 is Baidu’s official card. DeepSeek-OCR is DeepSeek’s.

Why this pairing instead of DeepSeek-OCR?

Unlimited-OCR-2 is already compared with DeepSeek-OCR. MiniCPM-OCR 1.0 is a new same-site OCR entity; the split here is size, license file, and family (MiniCPM-V/o vs Baidu SR-SWA).

Can either replace Acrobat Pro OCR?

Not independently tested. PDF toolboxes stay on Adobe Acrobat alternatives (Stirling-PDF, PDF Arranger, Okular).

Sources & verification

Last verified 2026-10-29 · Last updated 2026-10-29· Edited by forkalt editors · Editorial policy

License notes are not legal advice. Read the original LICENSE. Trademark & disclaimer.