Open-Source Discord Alternatives (2026)

Identifying Discord · Mark source

forkalt Discord-class job graphic listing Element and Rocket.Chat
forkalt comparison graphic (2026-10-25). Source · License: forkalt original.

People look for a Discord alternative when they want self-hosted community chat, Matrix federation, or an auditable messenger. This hub lists tools we verified on 2026-10-25. Discord is named only to identify that product class. Workplace Slack-class chat is a different hub.

Quick take.
  1. Element — Multi-licensed Matrix client (AGPL-3.0 or GPL-3.0 or Element commercial).
  2. Rocket.Chat — Open-core team comms. MIT outside ee/ dirs; Enterprise Edition has its own license.

How we pick

Comparison

NameLicenseStarsLast releasePlatformsRuns locallyKey strengths
ElementAGPL-3.0-or-later13,611v1.12.32Web, Linux, Windows, macOS, Android, iOSYesMulti-licensed Matrix client (AGPL-3.0 or GPL-3.0 or Element commercial).
Rocket.Chatother46,3178.9.0Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Web, Windows, macOS, Android, iOSYesOpen-core team comms. MIT outside ee/ dirs; Enterprise Edition has its own license.
Two Discord-class jobs: Element for Matrix clients, Rocket.Chat for MIT-plus-EE self-host comms
forkalt comparison graphic (2026-10-25). Not a ranking.

Listed options: Element (Matrix client, AGPL/GPL/commercial) and Rocket.Chat (MIT community plus EE directories). Identification only: Discord is Discord Inc.’s hosted community chat. We did not copy Discord pricing or a feature scorecard. Workplace chat is Slack alternatives (Zulip, Mattermost).

Sourced snapshot (2026-10-25)

Field Element Rocket.Chat
Repository github.com/element-hq/element-web github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat
Stars / forks 13,611 / 2,802 46,317 / 14,032
License AGPL-3.0-or-later or GPL-3.0-or-later or commercial Mixed (LICENSE; GitHub NOASSERTION)
Latest release in this check v1.12.32 (2026-10-16) 8.9.0 LTS (2026-10-05)
Job Matrix web / desktop client Self-host comms (open-core)
Self-host docs/install.md; app.element.io is hosted Docker / docs.rocket.chat
Quality vs Discord Not independently tested Not independently tested

Why Element is the Matrix row

“Open source Discord alternative” is a durable query. The Matrix-client row we could source on 2026-10-25 from a public GitHub README is Element (element-hq/element-web): 13,611 stars, v1.12.32, multi-licensed AGPL / GPL / commercial. Its job is a Matrix client, not a proof that it substitutes for Discord’s servers, Nitro, or stage channels.

Rocket.Chat is the higher-star self-host comms option (46,317 stars, 8.9.0 LTS). We list it because people search it next to Discord and Slack. We do not collapse LICENSE into “MIT.” Content outside ee/ is MIT; apps/meteor/ee/ and ee/ use the Enterprise Edition license. Same honesty pattern as Mattermost.

Who should switch

What we left out

Revolt / Stoat was not added: the GitHub handle we opened redirected to a discussions repo without a fetchable product LICENSE in this pass. Voice-first Discord clones remain queued until we open those LICENSE files on a dated check.

Listed options

FAQ

What is the best free Discord alternative I can self-host?

Among options we sourced on 2026-10-25, Element v1.12.32 is a Matrix client (13,611 stars) under AGPL-3.0-or-later, GPL-3.0-or-later, or a paid Element commercial license. Rocket.Chat 8.9.0 LTS is the higher-star self-host comms option (46,317 stars) but LICENSE is mixed (MIT outside ee/, Enterprise Edition inside). “Best” depends on Matrix federation versus a single-server comms stack. We have no bake-off.

Is Rocket.Chat fully open source?

Not as a single OSI SPDX. LICENSE (2026-10-25) licenses content outside ee/ as MIT (Expat) and apps/meteor/ee/ plus ee/ under the Rocket.Chat Enterprise Edition license. GitHub’s license field is NOASSERTION. Element’s README is AGPL or GPL or commercial.

Is this the same as Slack alternatives?

No. Slack alternatives lists Zulip and Mattermost for workplace team chat. Discord is community / voice. Element is a Matrix client. The hubs link to each other so the product classes stay distinct.

Can I use these commercially?

Element’s AGPL/GPL path is copyleft; a paid commercial license is the third option on the README. Rocket.Chat’s MIT tree is permissive; EE directories need their subscription terms. Not legal advice.

Sources & verification

Last verified 2026-10-25 · Last updated 2026-10-25· Edited by forkalt editors · Editorial policy

License notes are not legal advice. Read the original LICENSE. Trademark & disclaimer.